Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]
Author:
Keyword(s):
Year:  Vol:  Page: 


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kemper, S.
Right arrow Articles by Herman, R. E.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kemper, S.
Right arrow Articles by Herman, R. E.
The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 61:P327-P332 (2006)
© 2006 The Gerontological Society of America


RESEARCH ARTICLE

Age Differences in Memory-Load Interference Effects in Syntactic Processing

Susan Kemper and Ruth E. Herman

Dole Human Development Center, University of Kansas, Lawrence.

Address correspondence to S. Kemper, 3090 Dole Human Development Center, 1000 Sunnyside Avenue, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045. E-mail: skemper{at}ku.edu

The effects of a memory load on syntactic processing by younger and older adults were examined. Participants were asked to remember a noun phrase (NP) memory load while they read sentences varying in syntactic complexity. Two types of NPs were used as memory loads: proper names or definite descriptions referring to occupations or roles. The NPs used in the sentence and memory load either matched (e.g., all proper names or all occupations), or they mismatched. Participants read complex sentences more slowly than they did simpler sentences; for young adults, this complexity effect was exacerbated when memory interference was generated by matching NPs in the sentence and memory load, whereas for older adults, memory-load interference did not vary with sentence complexity or memory-load matching. These results suggest that a general reduction in older adults' processing capacity was produced by the memory load, whereas the matching memory loads and sentence NPs produced a more specific form of interference that affected young adults' online processing.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All GSA journals The Gerontologist
Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
Copyright © 2006 by The Gerontological Society of America.