Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]
Author:
Keyword(s):
Year:  Vol:  Page: 


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Werner, P.
Right arrow Articles by Korczyn, A.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Werner, P.
Right arrow Articles by Korczyn, A.
The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 61:P228-P236 (2006)
© 2006 The Gerontological Society of America


RESEARCH ARTICLE

Handwriting Process Variables Discriminating Mild Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment

Perla Werner, Sara Rosenblum, Gady Bar-On, Jeremia Heinik and Amos Korczyn

1 Department of Gerontology, University of Haifa, Israel.
2 Department of Occupational Therapy, University of Haifa, Israel.
3 Margoletz Psychogeriatric Center and Tel Aviv University, Israel.
4 Department of Neurology, Tel Aviv University, Israel.

Address correspondence to Perla Werner, PhD, Department of Gerontology, University of Haifa, Mt. Carmel, Haifa 31905, Israel. E-mail: werner{at}research.haifa.ac.il

This study's aims were (a) to examine kinematically the handwriting process of persons with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), compared with those with mild Alzheimer's disease and healthy controls; (b) to assess the importance of these measures for the differentiation of the groups; and (c) to assess characteristics of the handwriting process across different functional tasks. Thirty-one persons with MCI, 22 with mild Alzheimer's disease, and 41 healthy controls performed functional tasks while using a computerized system. We found significant differences between the groups in almost all measures, with the MCI group assuming a position between the other groups. Temporal measures were higher and pressure was lower in more cognitively deteriorated groups. Information gathered about kinematic measures, together with cognitive functioning, allowed us to classify 69% to 72% of the participants correctly, although the classification for the MCI group was relatively poor.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All GSA journals The Gerontologist
Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
Copyright © 2006 by The Gerontological Society of America.