Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]
Author:
Keyword(s):
Year:  Vol:  Page: 


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Troyer, A. K.
Right arrow Articles by Craik, F. I. M.
Right arrow Articles citing this Article
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Troyer, A. K.
Right arrow Articles by Craik, F. I. M.
The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 61:P67-P74 (2006)
© 2006 The Gerontological Society of America


RESEARCH ARTICLE

Name and Face Learning in Older Adults: Effects of Level of Processing, Self-Generation, and Intention to Learn

Angela K. Troyer, Andrea Häfliger, Mélanie J. Cadieux and Fergus I. M. Craik

1 Department of Psychology, Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
2 Department of Psychology, Glendon College, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
3 Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care and University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Address correspondence to Angela K. Troyer, PhD, Psychology Department, Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care, 3560 Bathurst Street, Toronto, Ontario M6A 2E1, Canada. E-mail: atroyer{at}baycrest.org

Many older adults are interested in strategies to help them learn new names. We examined the learning conditions that provide maximal benefit to name and face learning. In Experiment 1, consistent with levels-of-processing theory, name recall and recognition by 20 younger and 20 older adults was poorest with physical processing, intermediate with phonemic processing, and best with semantic processing. In Experiment 2, name and face learning in 20 younger and 20 older adults was maximized with semantic processing of names and physical processing of faces. Experiment 3 showed a benefit of self-generation and of intentional learning of name–face pairs in 24 older adults. Findings suggest that memory interventions should emphasize processing names semantically, processing faces physically, self-generating this information, and keeping in mind that memory for the names will be needed in the future.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All GSA journals The Gerontologist
Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
Copyright © 2006 by The Gerontological Society of America.