Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]
Author:
Keyword(s):
Year:  Vol:  Page: 


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shanahan, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hofer, S. M.
Right arrow Articles citing this Article
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shanahan, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hofer, S. M.
The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 60:65-76 (2005)
© 2005 The Gerontological Society of America


RESEARCH ARTICLE

Social Context in Gene–Environment Interactions: Retrospect and Prospect

Michael J. Shanahan1, and Scott M. Hofer2

1 University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
2 Pennsylvania State University, State College.

Address correspondence to Michael J. Shanahan, Department of Sociology, University of North Carolina, CB 3210, 212 Hamilton Hall, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3210. E-mail: mjshan{at}unc.edu

While many behavioral scientists believe that gene–environment (GE) interactions play an important and perhaps pervasive role in human development and aging, little attention has been devoted to a fundamental conceptual issue: What is it about social context that could alter gene expression? We draw on existing examples of GE interactions to formulate a typology that identifies a set of generic mechanisms by which E moderates G. Empirical studies suggest four ideal types: Social context can trigger a genetic diathesis, compensate for a genetic diathesis, act as a control to prevent behaviors for which there is a genetic predisposition, and enhance adaptation through proximal processes. This typology highlights several problems, however, with prior empirical research, which may explain, in part, why so few GE interactions have actually been observed. These problems include inattention to the dynamic nature of social experience, the manifold, often-intercorrelated dimensions of social context ("EE interactions"), mediators that link social context and the genotype, and analytic models that examine GE interactions as processes that characterize individual development. In turn, these insights call for the integration of life course sociology and behavioral genetics to foster ways of studying genes, context, and aging.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All GSA journals The Gerontologist
Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
Copyright © 2005 by The Gerontological Society of America.