Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]
Author:
Keyword(s):
Year:  Vol:  Page: 


This Article
Full Text
Full Text (PDF)
Alert me when this article is cited
Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Similar articles in this journal
Similar articles in PubMed
Alert me to new issues of the journal
Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Articles by Coeckelbergh, T. R. M.
Articles by Kooijman, A. C.
Articles citing this Article
PubMed
PubMed Citation
Articles by Coeckelbergh, T. R. M.
Articles by Kooijman, A. C.
The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 59:P11-P18 (2004)
© 2004 The Gerontological Society of America


RESEARCH ARTICLE

Age-Related Changes in the Functional Visual Field: Further Evidence for an Inverse Age x Eccentricity Effect

Tanja R. M. Coeckelbergh1, Frans W. Cornelissen1, Wiebo H. Brouwer2 and Aart C. Kooijman1,3,4

1 Laboratory of Experimental Ophthalmology, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
2 Department of Neuropsychology and Gerontology, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
3 Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Groningen, The Netherlands.
4 Visio, Dutch National Foundation for the Visually Impaired and Blind, Groningen, The Netherlands.

We assessed the performance of younger and older individuals by using the Attended Field of View test, a visual search task in which eye movements were allowed. When adjusting for slower processing in the older age group by log transformation, we observed significant effects of age, eccentricity, and Age x Eccentricity. Contrary to most previous findings, the Age x Eccentricity effect was "inverted" in that the difference between the age groups decreased as a function of eccentricity. The finding that the eccentricity effect of younger individuals was larger than that of older individuals was caused by large age-related differences in sensitivity for centrally located targets, even though differences with regard to foveal resolution were controlled. The results further indicated that, given a brief amount of time, older persons could process a smaller field of view than younger persons. Consequently, older persons were forced to resort to serial scanning for a larger part of the display, whereas younger persons could process a larger area in parallel.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All GSA journals The Gerontologist
Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
Copyright © 2004 by The Gerontological Society of America.