Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]
Author:
Keyword(s):
Year:  Vol:  Page: 


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Isaacowitz, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, J.
Right arrow Articles citing this Article
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Isaacowitz, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, J.
The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 58:P143-P152 (2003)
© 2003 The Gerontological Society of America


RESEARCH ARTICLE

Positive and Negative Affect in Very Old Age

Derek M. Isaacowitz1, and Jacqui Smith2,

1 Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
2 Center for Lifespan Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany.

Address correspondence to Jacqui Smith, Center for Lifespan Psychology, Institute for Human Development, Lentzeallee 94, 14195 Berlin, Germany. E-mail: Smith{at}mpib-berlin.mpg.de or dmi{at}brandeis.edu

The current study examined two issues involving the relationship between age and affect in very old age using data from men and women (aged 70 to 100+ years, M = 85 years) in the Berlin Aging Study (BASE). The first issue was whether unique effects of age on positive and negative affect remained after we controlled for other variables that would be expected to relate to affect in late life. We found no unique effects of age after we controlled for demographic, personality, and health and cognitive functioning variables. Personality and general intelligence emerged as the strongest predictors of positive and negative affect. Second, we evaluated patterns within meaningful subgroups: young old versus oldest old and men versus women. Subgroup differences in predictor patterns were minimal. Although we accounted for much of the age-related variance in positive and negative affect, a significant amount of variance in the affect of older adults remained unexplained.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All GSA journals The Gerontologist
Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
Copyright © 2003 by The Gerontological Society of America.