Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]
Author:
Keyword(s):
Year:  Vol:  Page: 


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Freund, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Baltes, P. B.
Right arrow Articles citing this Article
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Freund, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Baltes, P. B.
The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 57:P426-P434 (2002)
© 2002 The Gerontological Society of America


RESEARCH ARTICLE

The Adaptiveness of Selection, Optimization, and Compensation as Strategies of Life Management

Evidence From a Preference Study on Proverbs

Alexandra M. Freunda and Paul B. Baltesa

a Center for Lifespan Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany

Alexandra M. Freund, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Lentzeallee 94, 14195 Berlin, Germany E-mail: Sekbaltes{at}mpib-berlin.mpg.de.

Decision Editor: Margie E. Lachman, PhD

Proverbs were used to examine whether laypeople's conceptions of or preferences for life-management strategies are consistent with the model of selection, optimization, and compensation (SOC model). The SOC model posits that there are three fundamental processes of life management: selection, optimization, and compensation. In two studies (N = 64; N = 131), young (19–32 years) and older adults (59–85 years) were asked to match proverbs to sentence stems indicative of life-management situations. Of the proverbs, half reflected one component of SOC and half alternative, non-SOC life-management strategies. SOC-related and alternative proverbs were matched on familiarity, understandability, and meaningfulness. Two main results were obtained: Young and older adults chose proverbs reflecting SOC (a) more frequently and (b) faster than alternative proverbs. Study 3 (N = 60, 19–32 year-old participants) ruled out that these results were due to an artifact resulting from a stronger, purely semantic relationship of the specific sentence stems with the SOC-related proverbs. Studies 4 (N = 48 younger and older adults) and 5 (N = 20 younger adults) were conducted to test discriminant validity. In contrast with tasks involving long-term goal orientation and success, there were no preferences for SOC-related proverbs for life contexts involving relaxation or leisure. Taken together, results of these studies indicate that individuals, when asked to choose between alternative proverbs characterizing ways of managing life, prefer SOC-related proverbs.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All GSA journals The Gerontologist
Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
Copyright © 2002 by The Gerontological Society of America.