Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]
Author:
Keyword(s):
Year:  Vol:  Page: 


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Herbert, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Faubert, J.
Right arrow Articles citing this Article
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Herbert, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Faubert, J.
The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 57:P241-P245 (2002)
© 2002 The Gerontological Society of America


RESEARCH ARTICLE

Aging and Bilateral Symmetry Detection

Andrew M. Herberta, Olga Overburyb, Jason Singhb and Jocelyn Faubertc

a Department of Psychology, University of North Texas, Denton
b Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
c School of Optometry, University of Montreal, Canada

Andrew M. Herbert, University of North Texas, Department of Psychology, P.O. Box 311280, Denton, TX 76203-1280 E-mail: herberta{at}unt.edu.

Decision Editor: Margie E. Lachman, PhD

The salience of bilateral symmetry varies as a function of the orientation of the symmetry axis. Vertical symmetry is most salient, followed by horizontal and then oblique orientations. We tested symmetry detection in different age groups to determine whether performance of this intermediate-level visual task is affected by normal, nonpathological aging. We tested forty participants and analyzed the results with respect to age group and symmetry orientation (vertical, horizontal, and 45 degree oblique). There was a vertical symmetry detection advantage for all participants, where sensitivity was highest for vertical symmetry, followed by horizontal symmetry, and then the oblique symmetry. Sensitivity to symmetry did not differ for the two younger age groups (aged 19–39 and 40–60), but declined significantly for the group aged 61–70, and declined again for the oldest group aged 71–80. This age-related difference in sensitivity to symmetry was not reflected in a measure of bias, where there were no differences as a function of age.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All GSA journals The Gerontologist
Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
Copyright © 2002 by The Gerontological Society of America.