Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]
Author:
Keyword(s):
Year:  Vol:  Page: 


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Cited by other online articles
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lima, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Allen, S. M.
Right arrow Articles citing this Article
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lima, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Allen, S. M.
The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 56:S302-S310 (2001)
© 2001 The Gerontological Society of America


RESEARCH ARTICLE

Targeting Risk for Unmet Need

Not Enough Help Versus No Help at All

Julie C. Limaa and Susan M. Allenb

a Population Studies and Training Center, Brown University
b Center for Gerontology and Health Care Research, Brown University

Susan M. Allen, Center for Gerontology and Health Care Research, Brown University, Box G-B213, Providence, RI 02912 E-mail: Susan_Allen{at}Brown.edu.

Objectives. This study examined factors associated with unmet need for care among persons aged 18 and older who need help with daily living tasks. The analysis focused on two types of unmet need: not enough (or inadequate) help and no help at all.

Methods. The authors used multinomial logistic regression to examine differences between persons with long-term care needs who (a) had all their needs met; (b) received inadequate help; and (c) received no help at all. Data were from the Adult Followback to the National Health Interview Survey on Disability (NHIS-D) for 1994 and 1995.

Results. The determinants of inadequate care versus no care differed with respect to age, gender, level of impairment, and insurance status. Whereas age and gender were important in determining inadequate care, insurance coverage and availability of social support were key factors related to a situation of no care.

Discussion. The present study demonstrates that the characteristics of groups reporting inadequate care versus no care, and the factors associated with these situations, are quite different. Nevertheless, the most important demographic risk factors for both types of unmet need mirror demographic groups currently on the increase in the U.S. population.




This article has been cited by other articles: (Search Google Scholar for Other Citing Articles)


Home page
GerontologistHome page
S. Allen, L. Resnik, and J. Roy
Promoting Independence for Wheelchair Users: The Role of Home Accommodations
Gerontologist, February 1, 2006; 46(1): 115 - 123.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc SciHome page
S. M. Allen, A. Foster, and K. Berg
Receiving Help at Home: The Interplay of Human and Technological Assistance
J. Gerontol. B. Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci., November 1, 2001; 56(6): S374 - 382.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All GSA journals The Gerontologist
Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
Copyright © 2001 by The Gerontological Society of America.