|
|
||||||||
RESEARCH ARTICLE |
a Epidemiology, Demography, and Biometry Program, National Institute on Aging, Bethesda, Maryland
b The Johns Hopkins University Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
c Geriatric Department "I Fraticini, " National Research Institute (INRCA), Florence, Italy
d Centers for Disease Control, National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, Maryland
Eleanor M. Simonsick, Epidemiology, Demography, and Biometry Program, National Institute on Aging, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 3C-309, Bethesda, MD 20892 E-mail: simonsie{at}gw.nia.nih.gov.
Objectives.
To better understand disablement and transitions from impairment to disability, discrete valid measures of functional limitation are needed. This study reports the development and criterion-related validity of scales that quantify severity of upper and lower extremity functional limitation.
Methods.
Data are from 3,635 cognitively intact community-dwelling women aged 65 years and older and 1,002 moderately to severely disabled participants in the Women's Health and Aging Study. Scales assessing severity of upper and lower extremity functional limitation were constructed from commonly available questions on functional difficulty. Criterion-related validity was evaluated with self-report and performance-based measures.
Results
The upper and lower extremity scales range from 0 to 6 and 0 to 9, respectively. Scale scores were well distributed in the disabled group and discriminated limitations in the broader community. For both scales, rates of difficulty for all ADL and IADL increased (p < .001) with increasing severity score, and percent able and mean performance on respective upper and lower extremity tasks decreased (p < .01).
Discussion.
These scales, constructed from commonly used self-report measures of function, provide discrete measures of upper and lower functional limitation. Because these scales are distinct from measures of disability and impairment, their use should facilitate increased understanding of the disablement process.
This article has been cited by other articles: (Search Google Scholar for Other Citing Articles)
|
E. M. Crimmins, D. Alley, S. L. Reynolds, M. Johnston, A. Karlamangla, and T. Seeman Changes in Biological Markers of Health: Older Americans in the 1990s J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., November 1, 2005; 60(11): 1409 - 1413. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
A Bergland and T B Wyller Risk factors for serious fall related injury in elderly women living at home Inj. Prev., October 1, 2004; 10(5): 308 - 313. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
J. S. Long and E. K. Pavalko The Life Course of Activity Limitations:: Exploring Indicators of Functional Limitations Over Time J Aging Health, August 1, 2004; 16(4): 490 - 516. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
|
S D M Bot, C B Terwee, D A W M van der Windt, L M Bouter, J Dekker, and H C W de Vet Clinimetric evaluation of shoulder disability questionnaires: a systematic review of the literature Ann Rheum Dis, April 1, 2004; 63(4): 335 - 341. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Z. Zimmer, A. I. Hermalin, and H.-S. Lin Whose Education Counts? The Added Impact of Adult-Child Education on Physical Functioning of Older Taiwanese J. Gerontol. B. Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci., January 1, 2002; 57(1): S23 - 32. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
---|
All GSA journals | The Gerontologist |
Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences |