Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]
Author:
Keyword(s):
Year:  Vol:  Page: 


This Article
Full Text
Full Text (PDF)
Alert me when this article is cited
Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Similar articles in this journal
Similar articles in PubMed
Alert me to new issues of the journal
Download to citation manager
Cited by other online articles
Google Scholar
Articles by Freedman, V. A.
Articles citing this Article
PubMed
PubMed Citation
Articles by Freedman, V. A.
The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 55:S288-S297 (2000)
© 2000 The Gerontological Society of America


RESEARCH ARTICLE

Implications of Asking "Ambiguous" Difficulty Questions

An Analysis of the Second Wave of the Asset and Health Dynamics of the Oldest Old Study

Vicki A. Freedmana

a Polisher Research Institute, Philadelphia Geriatric Center

Vicki A. Freedman, Senior Research Scientist, Polisher Research Institute, Philadelphia Geriatric Center, The Pavilion, Suite 427, 261 Old York Road, P.O. Box 728, Jenkintown, PA 19046-7128 E-mail: vfreedman{at}pgc.org.

Objectives. This study explores the analytic implications of using questions about difficulty with daily activities that do not specify whether to consider assistance.

Methods. For 1,054 Asset and Health Dynamics of the Oldest Old Study Wave 2 respondents, we compared responses to questions about difficulty without reference to assistance (ambiguous difficulty) to those about difficulty without help or equipment (underlying difficulty) and difficulty with help or equipment, if used (residual difficulty). We modelled predictors of discordance by means of logistic regression.

Results. Discordance exists for 15% of respondents between summary variables indicating underlying and ambiguous difficulty with one or more activities. Discrepancies are evenly split between respondents reporting (a) underlying but no ambiguous difficulty and (b) ambiguous but no underlying difficulty. Discordance also exists for 15% of respondents between summary variables indicating residual and ambiguous difficulty with one or more activities; most of these discrepancies involve reports of ambiguous but no residual difficulty. Most respondent characteristics investigated are not significant predictors of discrepancies.

Discussion. Analysts should be aware that (a) ambiguously worded questions appear to be a better proxy for underlying than for residual difficulty, (b) discrepancies seem to be lower for separate activities than for summary variables indicating difficulty with one or more activities, and (c) being Hispanic and receiving help may affect reporting discrepancies.




This article has been cited by other articles: (Search Google Scholar for Other Citing Articles)


Home page
GerontologistHome page
R. J. Calsyn, J. P. Winter, and R. D. Yonker
Should Disability Items in the Census Be Used for Planning Services for Elders?
Gerontologist, October 1, 2001; 41(5): 583 - 588.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All GSA journals The Gerontologist
Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
Copyright © 2000 by The Gerontological Society of America.