HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Cited by other online articles Google Scholar Articles by Chappell, N. L. Articles by Reid, R. C. Articles citing this Article PubMed Articles by Chappell, N. L. Articles by Reid, R. C.

Dimensions of Care for Dementia Sufferers in Long-Term Care Institutions

Are They Related to Outcomes?

^a Centre on Aging, University of Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
^b Department of Sociology, University of Victoria, British Columbia, Canada

Neena L. Chappell, Director, Centre on Aging, Sedgewick Building, Rm. A104, University of Victoria, P.O. Box 1700, Victoria, BC, V8W 2Y2, Canada E-mail: nlc{at}uvic.ca.

Objectives. This study empirically examined whether dimensions of care cluster in special care units (SCUs) compared with non-SCUs. The relationship between SCU status plus separate measures of the dimensions of care and outcomes for dementia sufferers was then investigated.

Methods. Data were drawn from the Intermediate Care Facility Project. The sample () included residents with dementia, aged 65 and older, in intermediate care facilities throughout the province of British Columbia, Canada. Longitudinal data included 6 outcomes: cognitive function, behavioral problems of agitation and social skills, physical functioning, and quality of life measured through affect and expressive language skills. Separate multiple linear regression equations were estimated, relating each of these outcomes to 5 dimensions of care: preadmission and admission procedures, staff training and education, nonuse of physical and chemical restraints, flexible care routines and resident-relevant activities, and the environment.

Results. The results showed there is virtually no clustering of dimensions along SCU/non-SCU lines. Neither SCU status nor the individual dimensions were highly predictive of outcomes. Residents' affect at t₁ emerged as a characteristic that was significantly correlated with other outcomes.

Discussion. This Canadian research can be added to the few but growing number of rigorous studies that suggest SCUs are not homogeneous and do not necessarily provide better care than non-SCUs. Moreover, it raises questions about the benefits of "best practice" dimensions of care, regardless of SCU status.

This article has been cited by other articles: (Search Google Scholar for Other Citing Articles)

				P. D. Sloane, S. Zimmerman, A. L. Gruber-Baldini, J. R. Hebel, J. Magaziner, and T. R. Konrad Health and Functional Outcomes and Health Care Utilization of Persons With Dementia in Residential Care and Assisted Living Facilities: Comparison With Nursing Homes Gerontologist, October 1, 2005; 45(suppl_1): 124 - 134. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. B. Tornatore and L. A. Grant Burden Among Family Caregivers of Persons With Alzheimer's Disease in Nursing Homes Gerontologist, August 1, 2002; 42(4): 497 - 506. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]