HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
---|
|
Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, Vol 52, Issue 6 P254-P264, Copyright © 1997 by The Gerontological Society of America
REVIEWS |
DM Burke
Pomona College, Claremont, CA 91711, USA. [email protected]
This article evaluates the success of Inhibitory Deficit theory in addressing two basic functions of a theory: explaining available results and predicting new findings. The review focuses on language comprehension and production, domains of cognition vulnerable to age- linked inhibitory deficits under the theory. Considerable research, however, reports remarkable age constancy in many aspects of language performance, contrary to the predictions of Inhibitory Deficit theory. For conditions that do produce age differences in language comprehension and production, evidence for inhibitory deficits is controversial at best. In predicting new findings, Inhibitory Deficit theory is constrained by lack of a well specified model, producing confusion between inhibition that occurs at a behavioral level versus a theoretical level. Modification of the theory is required to bring it in line with empirical findings on language and aging, and greater specification of underlying processes is required to reduce contradictions in predictions.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
C. C. Persad, N. Abeles, R. T. Zacks, and N. L. Denburg Inhibitory Changes After Age 60 and Their Relationship to Measures of Attention and Memory J. Gerontol. B. Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci., May 1, 2002; 57(3): P223 - 232. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
---|
All GSA journals | The Gerontologist |
Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences |