| HOME | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RESEARCH ARTICLE |
a Department of Behavioral Sciences and the Zlotowski Center for Neuroscience, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
Nachshon Meiran, Department of Behavioral Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel 84105 E-mail: nmeiran{at}bgumail.bgu.ac.il.
Decision Editor: Toni C. Antonucci, PhD
| Abstract |
|---|
PERFORMANCE in everyday situations involves frequent changes of immediate behavioral goals or mental sets. Because set switching seems to be relevant for adaptive behavior, studying how it is affected by old age is highly important. Furthermore, research suggests that, like other executive control functions, set-switching ability involves the prefrontal cortex (
Eslinger and Grattan 1993
;
Rogers, Sahakian, Hodges, Polkey, Kennard, and Robbins 1998
;
Owen et al. 1993
;
Shallice 1994
;
Stuss, Shallice, Alexander, and Picton 1995
), and that age-related decline in cognitive functions is partly due to the associated age-related changes in the prefrontal cortex (e.g.,
Moscovitch and Winocur 1992
;
Raz, Gunning-Dixon, Head, Dupuis, and Acker 1998
;
West 1996
). Thus, it is reasonable to predict that aging will influence task-switching ability.
| Component Processes in Task Switching |
|---|
Following
Fagot 1994
and
Los 1999
,
Los 2000
, we distinguish among three experimental conditions. (Please see
Fig. 1.) In explaining these conditions, we mark each trial in a sequence by the task being performed (e.g., Task A). The first condition is single task (e.g., AAA ... or BBB ...), where a sequence of trials involves the same task. The other two conditions are included in mixed-task blocks, where trials involving Task A and Task B are intermixed. Switch trials (e.g., AABAA ...) are those in which the task is different from the task in the preceding trial. No-switch trials (e.g. AABAA ...) are those in which the task is the same as the task in the preceding trial. The reaction time (RT) difference between single-task (fastest) and switch trials (slowest) is termed alternation cost. As we argue below, alternation cost does not represent a single entity and is therefore decomposed into two large components: mixed-list cost (no-switch RT minus single task RT) and switching-cost (switch RT minus no-switch RT).
|
An important advantage of the cuing paradigm is that it allows for a tight control over two intervals which theoretically represent two distinct processes. One interval, the Response-Cue Interval (RCI), is that period of time between the response in Trial N-1 and the cue in Trial N. During this period, participants have not yet been informed which task is next. Thus, participants are unlikely to use the RCI for preparation (see
Meiran, Chorev, and Sapir 2000
, for an empirical support). Nonetheless, the results also indicate that extending the RCI resulted in a reduction in switching-cost. Given the considerations mentioned so far, this reduction in switching-cost is attributed to passive dissipation of the task set adopted in the previous trial.
We also manipulated task-preparation time, the Cue-Target Interval (CTI), and found that increasing it sharply reduced switching-cost (e.g.,
Meiran 1996
;
Meiran, Chorev, and Sapir 2000
). The reason why the CTI represents preparation is that the instructional cue has already been given, enabling participants to know which task is next and to prepare for it. Finally, even when given ample time to prepare, switching-cost is not usually eliminated. Thus, the three subcomponents of switching-cost include [set] dissipation component, related to cost that is reduced by increasing RCI; preparatory component, reflecting cost reduced by increasing CTI; and residual component, the switching-cost given a very long CTI.
There are a number of indications that these various components of alternation cost represent separate abilities. These indications are based on empirical dissociations, namely, variables that affect the components differentially. We shall mention three examples. First,
Meiran, Chorev, and Sapir 2000
found that practice within a single experimental session resulted in a reduction in the preparatory component of switching-cost but did not affect the residual component. A second session of practice reduced residual cost without affecting preparatory cost. Moreover, practice did not modulate the dissipation component.
Second, the valence of task elements (such as stimuli and the responses) also indicates dissociations. A univalent element is relevant in only one task, while a bivalent element is relevant in two tasks. Using the present paradigm as an example, a univalent target stimulus may be one positioned centrally along the updown axis but on the right side of the rightleft axis. In this example, only the rightleft dimension is task relevant. In comparison, an upper left target is considered a bivalent stimulus because the vertical and horizontal axes are both task relevant.
Meiran 2000b
found that the preparatory component of switching-cost was almost eliminated when the target stimulus was univalent.
Response valence refers to whether the same physical response is used in more than one task. In the example above, pressing one key to indicate up or left is considered a bivalent response because the physical key-press is relevant in both tasks. When each of the four nominal responses, up, down, right, and left, is mapped to a separate key-press, these responses are considered univalent because each response is relevant for one task only.
Meiran 2000b
found that residual cost was eliminated by using univalent responses, while preparatory cost was preserved (see Appendix, Note 1).
Finally, the components were dissociated with respect to congruency. Congruency is relevant when using bivalent response setups where, for example, pressing one key to indicate up and left and pressing the other key to indicate right and down. In the example, trials involving the upper left and the lower right target stimuli are considered congruent because the same key-press is considered as the correct response in either task. In contrast, trials involving upper right or lower left targets are considered incongruent because each of the two taskrules indicates a different key-press as the correct response.
Fagot 1994
found that switching-cost was not affected by congruency while mixing-cost was strongly reduced in the congruent condition compared to the incongruent condition. Fagot's conclusion may have been a little extreme since, in our lab, we typically find a small effect of congruency on residual switching-cost, which sometimes reaches statistical significance. Nonetheless, the dissociation is evident in that the effect of congruency on mixing-cost is much stronger than its effects on residual cost.
In conclusion, we argue that alternation cost does not represent a single ability but comprises several abilities or component processes. This argument is supported by the fact that there are variables which affect the various components differentially. We have used this theoretical framework in trying to understand previous results concerning age-related changes in task-switching performance.
| Set-Switching Ability in Old Age |
|---|
Increased alternation cost.
Botwinick, Brinley, and Robbin 1958
asked participants to add numbers (AAA ... ), subtract numbers (BBB ...), or to systematically alternate between adding and subtracting (ABAB ...). The results indicate that the elderly were more strongly affected by task alternation than young participants were. Similar results were obtained by
Brinley 1965
, who extended the results to three different versions of the alternation paradigm. Because the stimuli were presented in a list, the conditions were roughly analogous to discrete presentation with very short intertrial interval (see
Fagot 1994
, for a partial support for this assumption). Thus, there was no time allowed for set dissipation or task preparation, and the results indicate the effects of old age on alternation cost.
Increased mixing-cost and switching-cost.
Kray and Lin- denberger (2000) used a variety of tasks and looked at old-age effects on switching-cost and on a measure roughly analogous to mixing-cost. Their results indicated large age effects on mixing-costs and a modest effect on switching-cost. Similar results were found by De Jong, Emans, Eenshuistra, and Wagenmakers (1998). Like
Kray and Lindenberger 2000
,
Salthouse, Fristoe, McGuthry, and Hambrick 1998
found moderate effects of age on switching-costs. They used a variety of tasks, discrete presentation, and manipulated task-switching within a block.
Normal preparatory component.
Hartley, Kieley, and Slabach 1990
found that switching-cost was reduced by increasing the CTI, but the rate by which preparation reduced switching-cost was similar in the two age groups.
De Jong and associates 1998
,
Kramer, Hahn, and Gopher 1999
,
Kray and Lindenberger 2000
, and
Mayr and Liebscher in press
have recently reported similar findings. We wish to note that the relatively intact preparatory component in old age probably depends on the use of instructional cues. When no such cues were provided in Experiment 3 in Kramer and colleagues' study, elderly participants did not reduce their switching-costs by preparation. Nonetheless, this issue is not yet resolved because Kray and Lindenberger, who did not use cues either, found normal reduction in switching-cost among elderly subjects. One difference between the two experiments was that in Kramer and coworkers' study, participants switched tasks every fifth trial, which may have placed them under relatively heavy memory demands. In contrast, the tasks in Kray and Lindenberger's study switched every second trial. Regardless of these yet unresolved differences, there is a consensus regarding relatively normal preparatory component in old age when explicit instructional cues are provided.
Slightly increased residual component.
De Jong and colleagues 1998
,
Kramer and associates 1999
, and
Kray and Lindenberger 2000
found that old-age effects on the residual costs were rather small and were not always significant (i.e., in the longest preparatory interval after practice in Kray & Lindenberger's study). Moreover, Kramer and colleagues' results as well as those of
De Jong 2000
strongly suggest that age differences in the residual component diminish with practice. The only exception is
Mayr and Liebscher in press
study, showing a slight insignificant trend in the reverse direction.
Old-age effects on the dissipating component.
To the best of our knowledge, no one has yet examined how old age affects the rate of task-set dissipation. Interesting and related evidence for slowed task-set disengagement comes from a study by
Mayr and Liebscher in press
. These researchers asked their participants to perform in single-task blocks, task-alternation blocks, and fade-out blocks. The fade-out blocks were composed of 40 alternation trials followed by 80 single-task trials. Moreover, participants were told in advance that a single-task condition will follow, and the shift from the mixed-task condition to the single-task condition was clearly indicated on-line. The shift from the mixed-task condition to single-task condition was initially accompanied by poor performance, but performance improved over trials. The young participants needed only a few trials to return to single-task level of performance. This was not the case for the elderly participants, who were especially slowed in the fade-out blocks and who did not return to single-task levels of performance even after eighty pure-task trials.
Nonetheless, one may distinguish between two levels of sets. At the lower level, there are sets which deal with executing a particular task. For example, the updown task involves a set which determines that the vertical dimension is the relevant stimulus dimension, and the mapping of up and down to responses. Another type of set involves the overall structure of the experiment, where one may consider an alternation set, which enables the participant to deal with the fact that the tasks change unpredictably. This set may involve attending to the instructional cues. Thus, Mayr and Liebscher's demonstration may indicate the rate by which participants disengaged from the higher-order task-alternation set rather than the rate at which they disengaged from the lower-order task set. An obvious difference between disengaging from the "alternation set" and disengaging from a task set is the time scale. Whereas disengaging from a task-alternation set may take several seconds, disengaging from a task set takes about 1 s (
Meiran, Chorev, and Sapir 2000
).
To summarize, the review of the literature suggests that old age is associated with an increase in alternation cost. Nonetheless, the increase is not homogeneous across the various components of alternation cost. First, there seems to be a large increase in mixing-costs coupled with a smaller increase in switching-cost. With regard to switching-cost, only the preparatory and residual subcomponents were studied, and the results indicate a relatively intact preparatory component and a slightly impaired residual component. The purpose of the present study was to support our theoretical interpretation of the literature using a uniform experimental paradigm. To complete the picture concerning all four components, we explored old age effects on the dissipating component, which had not previously been done (see Appendix, Note 2).
| General Methods |
|---|
In Experiments 1 and 3, where the two-key response setup was used ( Fig. 2), half of the participants in each age group were assigned to each response-key combination: either upper left and lower right or upper right and lower left.
|
The (Hebrew) Vocabulary subset from the Intellectual Differential Aptitude Test battery (
Fischman 1982
) was used to estimate premorbid intelligence among the Israeli participants. This test was comprised of 40 multiple-choice questions. Its score is the number correct (040), its internal reliability is .89, and its testretest reliability is .80.
Procedure
The experiment was run as a single session, lasting between 40 min and 1.5 hr, depending on participants' performance. It began with RT testing, after which each participant completed the vocabulary test. The participants were encouraged to stretch between blocks. When the two-key setup was employed (Experiments 1 and 3), the center of the keypad was aligned with the center of the monitor by shifting the entire keyboard to the left. Each experiment consisted of a warm-up block (20 trials) followed by 45 experimental blocks. Each trial within a block consisted of an empty grid presented during the RCI, the presentation of the instructional cue presented during the CTI, and the presentation of the target stimulus until the response was given. 400-Hz beeps for 100 ms signaled errors. The task, target location, and CTI (Experiments 1 and 2) were selected randomly on each trial. Hence, the instructional cue did not indicate the upcoming target location, key-press, or precise target onset.
Analysis
Trials immediately following an error or an RT that exceeded 5 sec were excluded from all analyses. RT in the remaining trials was not analyzed if it exceeded 5 sec or if the response was erroneous. The mean RT (or the proportion of errors) per condition served to represent a given participant in the following analyses. Alpha level was set at .05 in all of the analyses.
In addition to the main analyses of mean RT, we also ran backup analyses on the mean logarithm of RT (LogRT). Results concerning the latter analysis are reported only if there were discrepancies concerning statistical significance of interactions with age. An advantage of LogRTs is that differences between logarithms represent proportions, thus controlling for general slowing. However, we do not wish to place an emphasis on the analysis of LogRT since general slowing cannot account for our results. Specifically, we found that old age was associated with a pattern of relatively intact and relatively impaired abilities.
| Experiment 1 |
|---|
Given the literature reviewed, we predicted that mixing-cost would be increased among the elderly. This prediction is indicated by the two-way interaction between age and mixing. With respect to switching-cost, we predicted a significant two-way interaction between CTI and task-switching, coupled with a significant simple effect of task-switching in the long CTI. This pattern of significant effects indicates the preparatory and the residual components of switching-cost, respectively. We also predicted a significant two-way interaction between age and task-switching, and an insignificant triple interaction among age, CTI, and task-switching. The latter pattern of significant results indicates that old age is associated with a relatively unimpaired preparatory component and an increased residual component.
| Methods |
|---|
|
| Results and Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
2 = .33, and with congruency, F(1,30) = 6.64, MSE = 360,832,
2 = .18, are revealing, in spite of being qualified by the triple interaction. They indicate that the elderly suffered greater switching-costs and showed larger congruency effects compared to the young participants. An additional significant interaction involving age included block, F(1,30) = 4.26, MSE = 242,966,
2 = .12 (not significant (ns) in LogRT). The interaction reflects the fact that the elderly subjects gained more from time on task than the young participants did. In addition, there was a significant two-way interaction between CTI and task-switching, F(1, 30) = 19.99, MSE = 41,319 (
Fig. 4). As usually found, task-switchingcost was reduced by increasing the CTI, indicating the preparatory component. Block interacted significantly with task-switch, F(1,30) = 11.02, MSE = 30,212, and with congruency, F(1,30) = 4.19, MSE = 34,413, reflecting that time on task resulted in smaller congruency effects (see Appendix, Note 4) and smaller switching-costs. It is important to note that the triple interaction among age, CTI, and task-switching did not approach significance F = 1.04,
2 = .03. Coupled with the significant interaction between age and task-switching, the results indicate a relatively normal preparatory component in old age and an enlarged residual component. A planned contrast indicated that the residual switching-cost (measured at the longest CTI) differed significantly between the two groups, F(1,30) = 11.58, MSE = 9,789,
2 = .28.
|
|
Single-Task Performance
Errors.
There were virtually no errors in the single task condition: .4% and 0% in the congruent condition for the young participants and the elderly participants, respectively, and 1.2% in both groups in the incongruent condition. All the remaining analyses were thus conducted exclusively on RTs.
Adjustment to single-task conditions.
In the first analysis we wished to examine whether Mayr and Liebscher's results concerning fade-out could be replicated using our paradigm. Unlike Mayr and Liebscher, we decided to include the single-task condition at the end of the experiment for the reasons specified above. Consequently, there was no single-task baseline. Our partial solution to the problem was to analyze the no-switch trials together with the single-task trials. Each block in the mixed-task condition was subdivided to two miniblocks of 40 trials each. Each of the resulting miniblocks was represented by the mean RT in the no-switch trials. The single-task trials were arranged into miniblocks of 8 trials each. Thus, each participant was represented by 18 means, representing between 17 and 20 RTs (mixed) and between 7 and 8 RTs (single), on average. A two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted according to age and miniblock, and both the main effect for age group, F(1,30) = 20.56, MSE = 789,560, and for miniblock, F(17,510) = 9.79, MSE = 27,129 were significant, as well as the interaction, F(7,510) = 6.61, MSE = 32,237 (see
Fig. 5).
|
2 = .09 (not significant in LogRT), indicating that the elderly gained more from mixed-task practice than the young participants did. We then analyzed the transition from the mixed-task condition to the single-task condition (miniblocks 8 and 9). The results indicated a significant main effect of age, while both the main effect of miniblock and the interaction did not approach significance. The transition results indicate that performance in the last mixed-task miniblock and the first single-task miniblock did not differ significantly. Finally, we analyzed the single-task trials only (miniblocks 918). In the final analysis, both main effects were significant as well as the interaction, F(9,270) = 7.23, MSE = 10,697. As shown in
Fig. 5, the elderly subjects showed faster and more pronounced improvement in performance than the young participants. This impression was confirmed statistically by tests of the polynomial components of the interaction of which the linear and quadratic components reached significance, F(1,30) = 12.40, 16.15, MSE = 29,621, 16,425,
2 = .29, .35, respectively. To summarize, time on task improved no-switch performance, but the learning rate was only slightly faster among the elderly participants compared to the young participants. The level of performance in the first single-task miniblock was similar to that in the last mixed-task halfblock. Finally, time on task improved single-task performance beyond the best level achieved in the mixed-task condition. Moreover, this improvement continued longer among the elderly participants compared to the young ones.
Another important issue concerns effects of old age on mixing-costs. To examine this issue, we compared the last six mixed-task miniblocks to the last six single-trial miniblocks. We chose these miniblocks in order to reduce to a minimum the effect of adjustment to single-task conditions (examined above), while at the same time keeping a sufficient number of trials to analyze. Of interest is the interaction between mixing (mixed vs single) and age, which was significant, F(1,30) = 13.09, MSE = 175,944,
2 = .30. This result confirms the conclusion that old age has a relatively pronounced effect on mixing-cost.
Main analysis of the single-task condition.
For the reasons specified above, we excluded the first miniblock and analyzed the results according to age, CTI, and congruency. There were between 7 and 10 analyzable RTs per condition, on average, and the relevant results are presented in Table 2 .
All the main effects were significant including age, F(1, 30) = 11.97, MSE = 218,264, CTI, F(1,30) = 25.84, MSE = 3,469, and congruency, F(1,30) = 23.75, MSE = 8,319. None of the interactions were significant, including the interaction between age and congruency, F = 2.12, MSE = 8,319,
2 = .07. Although the main effect of congruency was significant, it was much smaller (39 and 72 ms among the young participants and the elderly ones, respectively) than in the mixed-task condition. The relevant comparison is with no-switch trial in the mixed-task conditions. Congruency effects were much larger in these conditions, 84 and 213 ms, among the young participants and the elderly participants, respectively.
Task repetitions preceding the switch trial.
Given the analysis of single-task performance, one possibility is that when the same task repeats for a few trials, this mimics single-task performance, resulting in a larger decrement in performance when the task is switched. In order to test this possibility, we classified the trials according to the number of task repetitions which preceded them. Four levels were formed: zero (meaning that the preceding trial was a switch trial), 1, 2, and 3 or more. Longer sequences of repeated task were relatively rare (less than 6%), and consisted of about 2 trials per cell, on average. We then conducted an ANOVA according to age, task-switching, CTI, and preceding task repetitions. Preceding task repetitions was not associated with any significant source of variation. Thus, we can rule out the explanation above for short sequences of repeated tasks. It is possible that the results would have resembled single-task results had we examined longer sequences of repeated tasks.
In summary, the results indicate that old age was associated with an increase in both mixing-cost and switching-cost. With respect to switching-cost, its preparatory component was barely influenced by old age while the residual component was increased among elderly participants. In agreement with
Fagot 1994
, we found increased congruency effects in the mixed condition. It is interesting to note that the results suggest that components that are relatively strongly influenced by congruency (mixing-costs) are also relatively strongly influenced by old age. This issue was examined in Experiment 2.
| Experiment 2 |
|---|
The second goal was to examine the time course of task preparation in detail. For that purpose, we included four CTIs rather than just two CTIs. We reasoned that a differential rate of preparation would result in relatively enlarged age differences in switching-costs in intermediate CTIs. This is because when the CTI is short, both groups are minimally prepared for the task-switch, whereas when the CTI is very long, both groups are maximally prepared. In intermediate CTIs, the elderly participants might be less prepared than young participants and exhibit larger switching-costs (see Appendix, Note 5).
| Methods |
|---|
Procedure
The experiment was similar to Experiment 1 except that the participants used the four-key setup (
Fig. 2) instead of the two-key setup. For that purpose, the center of the keyboard was aligned with the center of the monitor. RT testing began with warm-up (20 trials) followed by four identical blocks (96 trials each). The trial structure was similar to that in Experiment 1 except that the constant RCI was 1,016 ms and the CTI varied randomly between trials (116, 416, 1,016, 3,016 ms).
| Results and Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
2 = .30, as well as the interaction between task-switching and CTI, F(3,84) = 17.49, MSE = 8,754. The triple interaction among age, task-switching and CTI did not approach significance, F < 1 (
Fig. 6). Of interest are two components of this interaction. The quadratic component indicates that age differences in switching-cost were elevated in intermediate CTIs. Such a pattern corresponds to faster task preparation among the young participants relative to the elderly ones, as explained before. This component of the interaction did not approach significance, F < 1,
2 = .02. The linear component of the triple interaction reflects the fact that one group has shown a greater reduction in switching-cost due to increasing the CTI. This component of the triple interaction was also nonsignificant, F < 1,
2 = .03, with the young participants showing less numerical reduction in switching-cost as compared to the elderly ones. In other words, we replicated the results of Experiment 1, showing that old age barely affected the preparatory component of switching-cost.
|
Error Rate
There were three significant sources of variation: task-switching, F(1,28) = 11.63, MSE = .003; CTI, F(3,84) = 12.12, MSE = .001; and the interaction between these variables, F(3,84) = 9.40, MSE = .001. This interaction resulted from a larger task-switching cost in the shortest CTI than in the remaining CTIs. In the shortest CTI, PE = .06 and .03 in the switch condition and the no-switch condition, respectively. In the next shortest CTI, PE = .03 and .02, the next longest, PE = .02 and .02, and in the longest CTI, PE = .02 and .01. This observation was supported by a significant contrast comparing the PE switching-cost in the first CTI to that in remaining CTIs, F(1,28) = 14.25, MSE = .012. The triple interaction involving age, CTI, and task-switching was not significant, F = 1.42.
Error Types
The four-key version of the paradigm enables the identification of task errors. These are responses in which the task is wrong, but the choice within the task is correct, e.g., in the right-left task, responding up to an upper right target stimulus. Task errors are especially relevant in the present context since they indicate a difficulty in task-switching and task-mixing. Two other possible errors are choice errors (e.g., responding right instead of left) and complete errors, where neither the task nor the choice within the task is correct. Complete errors were extremely rare, .05 error per condition, on average, and are therefore omitted from
Fig. 7.
|
The results can be summarized as follows. Switching-cost was statistically abolished by task preparation among the young participants, replicating
Meiran 2000b
results. This was not the case for the elderly participants, who exhibited significant residual cost. Hence, the results concerning residual cost indicate that the difficulties older persons have in residual cost is at least partly unrelated to their enlarged congruency effect. In that respect, the results challenge our processing model (
Meiran 2000a
,
Meiran 2000b
), which predicts zero residual costs with univalent responses. Apparently, residual costs are influenced by more factors than specified in the model. As found in Experiment 1, the preparatory component of switching-cost was very similar in the two age groups.
| Experiment 3 |
|---|
| Methods |
|---|
The group of elderly participants was heterogeneous, since most of them were Canadian, and a few were Israeli. We could compare the two groups on RT only. However, mean RT was more strongly influenced by which keys were used than by group. All the Israeli participants used the 19 key combination, and their mean RT was 1,750 ms, which compares with 1,724 ms for the four Canadians who used the same keys. This difference was not significant. In contrast, the Canadians who used the 37 key combination were faster, 1,470 ms.
Procedure
The stimuli, sequence of events within a trial, and response setup (bivalent) were similar to those employed in Experiment 1. The RCI was 432 ms during the 20 warm-up trials. There were five blocks of experimental trials, each involving a different fixed RCI (132, 232, 432, 1,032, or 3,032 ms). The CTI was constant, 117 ms. Participants were informed that the RCI would be constant in the entire block and that it would be changed between blocks. The order of RCIs was randomly chosen for each participant.
| Results and Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2 = .30 (p = .11 in LogRT), between RCI and task-switching, F(4,168) = 2.49, MSE = 164,151, and between congruency and age, F(1,42) = 6.93, MSE = 79,631,
2 = .14 (ns in LogRT). Of special interest is the triple interaction among age, RCI, and task-switching (
Fig. 8), which did not approach significance, F = 1.46 (p = .12 in LogRT). Nonetheless, the theoretically relevant component of the interaction is the quadratic component, which approached significance, F(1,42) = 3.92, p = .054, MSE = 30,934,
2 = .08 (p < .05 in LogRT). This contrast indicates that age differences in switching-cost were elevated in the middle range of the RCI. Such a pattern corresponds to differential set-dissipation rates. Namely, when the RCI is very short, set dissipation did not yet affect either group, and when the RCI is very long, it affected both groups. In between, it had already affected the young participants but did not yet affect the elderly participants.
|
|
The results of the present experiment replicate those by
Meiran, Chorev, and Sapir 2000
, showing that increasing the RCI resulted in smaller switching-costs. The elderly participants had larger switching-costs and congruency effects compared to the young participants, as found in Experiment 1. Curiously, the triple interaction among age, congruency, and task-switching found in Experiment 1 was not replicated. With respect to our critical question, the results suggest a relatively modest influence of old age on set dissipation.
| General Discussion |
|---|
The conclusions are relatively straightforward. Old age had a marked effect on mixing-costs (
2 = .30) and congruency effects (
2 = .14.18). With respect to mixing-costs, we have successfully replicated
Mayr and Liebscher in press
fade-out results in our paradigm. The results indicated that old age was associated with a relatively prolonged adjustment to single-task conditions. We have also found that old age did not equally affect the three subcomponents of switching-cost. While old age had a modest influence on the set-dissipation component (
2 = .08) and a large influence on the residual component (
2 = .30.33), its influence on the preparatory component was negligible (
2 = .02.03).
We take these results as strong evidence that (a) task-switching is related to several distinct abilities, and (b) some task-switching abilities are barely influenced by old age while other switching abilities are strongly influenced by old age. The fact that old age effects were large for some components, while nearly absent for other components, rules out general slowing as an alternative explanation. If this explanation were relevant, one would predict that old age would be associated with a relatively uniform effect across the various components. In the remaining discussion, we will suggest which cognitive and brain processes may have mediated effects of old age on task-switching performance.
Cognitive Processes Mediating Old Age Effects on Task-Switching Performance
Our cognitive interpretation is based on a detailed processing model of task-switching (
Meiran 2000a
). This model was fit successfully to experimental results, and some critical predictions were confirmed (
Meiran 2000b
). It is assumed that performance on a given task makes it necessary to adopt several task sets. Task sets are psychological entities that deal with multivalent task elements. In the present paradigm, two task elements were multivalent: the stimuli and the responses. Hence, two task sets are involved: a stimulus task-set and a response task-set. For yet unknown reasons, participants activate the stimulus task-set while preparing for the upcoming task. Hence, the adoption of the stimulus task-set explains the preparatory component.
Unlike the stimulus task-set, which is activated while preparing for a task switch, the response task-set is assumed to adjust retroactively after response. In the case of a task-switch, this process readies the system for the wrong task. For example, after performing Task A, the response task-set is adjusted to fit the requirements of Task A. When switching to Task B, this implies performing with a suboptimally adjusted response task-set, giving rise to residual costs. In other words, in order to be completely prepared for a given task, participants need to respond a few times, with each response leading to a further partial adjustment of the response task set. Preparing in advance without actually responding is insufficient, since it results in an adjustment of the stimulus task-set but not in an adjustment of the response task-set.
Mixing-costs are explained by the fact that response-set adjustment cannot be completed in mixed-task conditions. The reason is that response-set adjustment is a gradual process, and a small incremental adjustment to Task A, for example, would be quickly cancelled by future adjustment to Task B. In single-task conditions, however, response-set adjustment is consistent since the incremental adjustments do not cancel each other, but, instead, are additive.
Our results indicate a relatively unimpaired preparatory component in old age. According to the model, the results indicate that old age does not influence the activation of stimulus task-sets. It should be noted that the activation of stimulus task-sets is equivalent to selectively attending to the task-relevant dimension. Therefore, our results indicate that old age has a relatively minor influence on the ability to dynamically change the focus of selectivity from one stimulus dimension to another stimulus dimension. In that respect, the present results add to previous demonstrations regarding minor influences of old age on some selective attention processes when the relevant information is cued in advance (e.g.,
Hartley et al. 1990
;
Hartley 1993
;
Madden, Pierce, and Allen 1992
).
More broadly, our results support the conclusion that some processes which, from the cognitivetheoretic perspective (e.g.,
Meiran 1996
, for a justification) represent executive control functions, are age-invariant. Another example is age invariance in negative priming in some conditions (e.g.,
Kieley and Hartley 1997
). The Psychological Refractory Period (PRP) paradigm is also relevant. The paradigm involves presenting stimuli of two tasks (ordered S1, S2) in rapid succession, followed immediately by responses (ordered R1, R2) to these stimuli. The common finding is that R2 is slowed when the interval between S1 and S2 is short. Contemporary models attribute the PRP effect to the fact that S2 processing must halt until the response selection mechanism has completed processing S1 (
Pashler 1998
). Results indicate that the PRP effect is larger among elderly adults. However, the strategy employed by young participants and elderly participants is similar in that response selection acts as a bottleneck while other processing stages seem to be executed in parallel (
Allen, Smith, Vires-Collins, and Sperry 1998
;
Hartley and Little 1999
). The results reviewed above are best explained as showing that elderly adults are slowed in response selection. However, their time-sharing strategies, which represent executive control, are the same as among young participants. In summary, several experimental paradigms, which are believed to tap executive control, indicate age invariance in some conditions and/or processes.
The largest influence on age was found in mixing-cost and in the residual cost. The larger mixing-costs among the elderly participants could be explained by the fact that the elderly participants adjusted the response task-set more fully in single-task conditions. This interpretation is supported by fitting the mathematical model developed by
Meiran 2000a
to the results of Experiment 1 (
Meiran and Gotler in press
). The results of this analysis are somewhat counterintuitive, showing that the elderly participants were better able than the young participants to take advantage of the single-task conditions. Given the apparent superiority of the elderly participants, it is quite likely that the results concerning mixing-cost represent a compensatory strategy used by the elderly participants rather than impairment. An alternative interpretation, which we cannot rule out, is that single-task conditions are less taxing in terms of working memory. Thus, effects of old age on mixing-costs may be interpreted as yet more evidence for the poor performance of elderly participants on tasks believed to tap working memory (see
Salthouse 1994
, for review) (see Appendix, Note 7).
The interpretation of old-age effects on residual costs is less clear. We can rule out three possible explanations. The first of these is the idea that age differences in residual costs may reflect differential adjustment of the response task-set. This explanation is probably incorrect given the effect measurements in Experiments 1 and 2. The best index for old-age effects on residual costs is the two-way interaction between age and task-switching. Using this index, we have shown that the proportion of age-related variance was similar in Experiment 1, which employed bivalent responses (
2 = .33) and Experiment 2, which employed univalent responses (
2 = .30). These results may suggest that most of the age-related variance in residual costs is not due to the differential adjustment of the response task-set. The reasoning is that response-set adjustment could not contribute to switching-costs in Experiment 2.
Second, we can rule out the idea that, compared to the young participants, the elderly ones may have prepared for a task-switch on a smaller proportion of the trials (see
De Jong 2000
,
De Jong et al. 1998
, for details). This account is also incomplete at best, since it leads to predicting a larger age difference in switching-cost in the long CTIs than in the short CTI, whereas we have found similar age-dependent differences in these CTIs. The reasoning underlying this prediction is that task preparation had not yet taken place in the short CTI. Thus differential preparation could not contribute to age-related differences. In contrast, differential preparation could contribute to age-dependent differences in switching-costs in the long CTIs, where an opportunity to prepare was given.
A third explanation is that the elderly have delayed stimulus-set adjustment until after the target stimulus was presented. Although we cannot rule out this account completely, we do not place too much faith in it. We have fitted our mathematical model to the results of Experiment 1 (
Meiran and Gotler in press
) and the results of this analysis indicated a relatively minor difference between the groups in stimulus-set adjustment. A hint concerning a possible explanation comes from a study in preparation, conducted on young adults, in which we compared two conditions involving bivalent responses. In one condition, the responses were compatible (e.g., the upper left key indicated up or left), while in the other condition, the responses were incompatible (e.g., the upper left key indicated down or right). We found increased residual cost in the incompatible condition relative to the compatible condition. Given the standard assumptions regarding compatibility, the results of the experiment can be interpreted as showing that residual costs increase when the response selection stage is prolonged. One such condition is old age (e.g.,
Allen et al. 1998
;
Allen, Madden, Weber, and Groth 1993
). The fact that
Meiran and Gotler in press
model fit results also indicated that the major influence of old age was on the speed of response selection and response initiation.
Our results concerning the dissipating component are tentative and thus should be interpreted with caution. Nonetheless, in experiments on young adults, we have shown that the dissipating component is insensitive to strategic manipulations (
Meiran, Chorev, and Sapir 2000
). Hence, the influence of age on that component may not be taken as evidence for deficient inhibitory processes (e.g,
Hasher, Stoltzfus, Zacks, and Rypma 1991
). Rather, the effect is more in line with theories concerning increased levels of cognitive noise in old age (e.g.,
Krueger and Allen 1987
;
Allen, Weber, and May 1993
). In the present case, the fact that an irrelevant task set is still active constitutes cognitive noise.
Brain Functions Mediating Old Age Effects on Task-Switching Performance
A final issue is related to the underlying brain mechanisms. First, although old age affects many parts of the brain, it is widely believed to have an especially marked effect on the prefrontal cortex (e.g.,
Raz, et al. 1998
;
West 1996
). Thus, functions that are affected by old age may or may not be related to the prefrontal cortex. However, functions that are not affected by old age are probably not subserved by the prefrontal cortex. There is now relatively direct evidence that alternation cost is elevated following a frontal damage (
Rubinstein, Evans, and Meyer 1994
). With respect to specific components,
Rogers and colleagues 1998
have measured switching-cost using univalent responses and a long preparatory interval. Thus, they have measured residual costs under conditions that are analogous to those employed in Experiment 2. Their results indicate elevated residual costs among patients with focal left prefrontal lesions, similar to our elderly participants.
Functional imaging studies indicate that alternation cost (the comparison of switch to single-task) is associated with an elevated level of blood oxygenation. This is also true for switching-costs (
Dove, Pollmann, Schubert, Wiggins, and von Cramon 2000
). A recent functional imaging study by
Dove, Schubert, Pollmann, Norris, and von Cramon 1999
used an event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) design to separate cue-related switch activity from target-related switch activity. The authors found that behavioral switching-costs were reduced by increasing the CTI. Importantly, target-related blood oxygenation (related to residual cost and the dissipating component) was found in prefrontal regions, while this was not the case for cue-related activity, reflecting task preparation. A similar conclusion can be drawn from the results by
Moulden and colleagues 1998
. These authors measured high-density event-related potentials (ERPs) when participants performed in a paradigm similar to the one employed in Experiment 2. The ERPs were locked to the presentation of the instructional cue and, hence, indicate the brain regions involved in the preparation for a task switch. There were three switch-specific ERP components: bi-occipital (N200), parietal (P390), and midfrontal (N430). The bi-occipital component probably reflects the fact that the cues were different in the two tasks and, hence, visual processing changed if there was a task switch. Although there was a midfrontal generator, it is probably unrelated to the preparatory component, because its maximum was reached 430 ms after the presentation of the instructional cue. However,
Meiran, Chorev, and Sapir 2000
, who used a similar paradigm, found that the task-switchingcost reached its minimum when the CTI reached 430 ms. Because causes must precede their consequences, the midfrontal generator is unlikely to be a major cause for the reduction in the behavioral task-switchingcost during the CTI. Taken together, the results reviewed in this section suggest that the preparatory component of switching-cost is not subserved by prefrontal brain regions, and is thus relatively preserved in old age. In contrast, residual cost is subserved by the prefrontal cortex, which may also be true for mixing-cost and the dissipating component of switching-cost. For this reason, these components of alternation cost are affected by old age.
Conclusions
We have used
Fagot 1994
theory, extended by
Meiran, Chorev, and Sapir 2000
, to organize our short review of the literature on task-switching in old age. The theory enabled us to come up with several empirical generalizations. We have supported these generalizations using a new paradigm, which has also enabled us to examine age-related variance in a yet untested component of set dissipation. Thus, the generalizations (perhaps excluding the dissipation component) seem to be relatively stable across a variety of switching paradigms. Our results indicate that some components of switching are age-variant and some are relatively age-invariant. The age-invariant abilities likely reflect the (cued) selective attention to the relevant stimulus dimension, probably subserved by posterior brain regions. In contrast, the age-variant abilities include the disproportional benefit from single-task conditions, and the elevated residual-cost and congruency effects. Some or all of these processes may result from the effects of old age on the prefrontal cortex.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received for publication December 7, 1998. Accepted for publication May 5, 2000.
| Appendix ENDIX |
|---|
Note 2. We should mention the fact that although only eight stimuli are shown (the combination of two instructional cues and four target locations) participants do not seem to learn specific stimulusresponse pairs. Such learning is possible for congruent trials, but is impossible for incongruent trials, where the same stimulus is associated with two different responses. Thus, one would predict an interaction between congruency and practice, but such an interaction is not found (see
Meiran 1996
, for details).
Note 3. Since all the main effects were qualified by interactions, the remaining main effects are not specified to save space.
Note 4. This is just another example which demonstrates that practice had a larger effect on incongruent trials than on congruent trials, contrary to what researchers would predict assuming that participants learn specific stimulus-response combinations. See Note 2.
Note 5. This trend is reflected in the quadratic component of the triple interaction among task-switching, CTI, and age.
Note 6. Our task analysis may be applicable for discrimination tasks only. A recent study in our lab (
Marciano 1999
) indicates significant differences in switching processes between samedifferent judgments and discrimination tasks.
Note 7. We prefer the former account over the working memory account given the mixed evidence on working memory and aging (for example
Belleville, Rouleau, and Caza 1998
, who did not find age effects). Moreover, the former account is based on explicit modeling of the results rather than a verbal description.
| References |
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Goffaux, N. A. Phillips, M. Sinai, and D. Pushkar Neurophysiological Measures of Task-Set Switching: Effects of Working Memory and Aging J. Gerontol. B. Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci., March 1, 2008; 63(2): P57 - P66. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Sharp, S. K. Scott, M. A. Mehta, and R. J.S. Wise The Neural Correlates of Declining Performance with Age: Evidence for Age-Related Changes in Cognitive Control Cereb Cortex, December 1, 2006; 16(12): 1739 - 1749. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|---|