HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Google Scholar Articles by Rabbitt, P. Articles by Cobain, M. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Rabbitt, P. Articles by Cobain, M.

Age and Ability Affect Practice Gains in Longitudinal Studies of Cognitive Change

¹ Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, England, and University of West Australia
² Department of Statistics, University of Oxford, England.
³ Department of Research and Development, Unilever PLC, London, England.

During a 20-year longitudinal study, 5,842 participants aged 49 to 93 years significantly improved over two to four successive experiences of the Heim AH4-1 intelligence test (first published in 1970), even with between-test intervals of 4 years and longer. After we considered significant attrition by death and dropout and the effects of gender, socioeconomic advantage, and recruitment cohort, we found that participants with high intelligence test scores showed greater improvement than did those with lower intelligence test scores. Practice gains also reduced with age, even after we took into consideration the individual differences in intelligence test scores. This emphasizes the methodological point that neglect of individual differences in improvement during longitudinal studies underestimates age-related changes in younger and more able participants and the theoretical point that, like all experiences during everyday life, participation in longitudinal studies alters the ability of aging humans to cope with cognitive demands to different extents according to their baseline abilities.

Key Words: Cognitive gain • Longitudinal study • Practice gains