Home
HOME ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 62:S100-S107 (2007)
© 2007 The Gerontological Society of America


RESEARCH ARTICLE

Solidarity–Conflict and Ambivalence: Testing Two Conceptual Frameworks and Their Impact on Quality of Life for Older Family Members

Ariela Lowenstein

Department of Masters in Gerontology, Center for Research and Study of Aging, Faculty of Welfare and Health Studies, The University of Haifa, Israel.

Address correspondence to Ariela Lowenstein, Head, Center for Research and Study of Aging, Faculty of Welfare and Health Studies, The University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel 31905. E-mail: ariela{at}research.haifa.ac.il

Objectives. The purpose of this study was to test empirically two major conceptualizations of parent–child relations in later adulthood—intergenerational solidarity–conflict and ambivalence paradigms—and their predictive validity on elders' quality of life using comparative cross-national data.

Methods. Data were from a sample of 2,064 elders (aged 75 and older) from the five-country OASIS study (Old Age and Autonomy: The Role of Service Systems and Intergenerational Family Solidarity; Norway, England, Germany, Spain, and Israel). Multivariate and block-recursive regression models estimated the predictivity of the two conceptualizations of family dynamics on quality of life controlling for country, personal characteristics, and activity of daily living functioning.

Results. Descriptive analyses indicated that family solidarity, especially the affective/cognitive component (called Solidarity A), was high in all five countries, whereas conflict and ambivalence were low. When I entered all three constructs into the regression Solidarity A, reciprocal intergenerational support and ambivalence predicted quality of life. Controlling for activity of daily living functioning, socioeconomics status, and country, intergenerational relations had only a weak explanatory power, and personal resources explained most of the variance.

Discussion. The data suggest that the three constructs exist simultaneously but in varying combinations, confirming that in cross-cultural contexts family cohesion predominates, albeit with low degrees of conflict and ambivalence. The solidarity construct evidenced relatively robust measurement. More work is required to enhance the ambivalence measurement.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social ScienceHome page
K. L. Fingerman, L. Pitzer, E. S. Lefkowitz, K. S. Birditt, and D. Mroczek
Ambivalent Relationship Qualities Between Adults and Their Parents: Implications for the Well-Being of Both Parties
J. Gerontol. B. Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci., November 1, 2008; 63(6): P362 - P371.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social ScienceHome page
R. A. Ward
Multiple Parent-Adult Child Relations and Well-Being in Middle and Later Life
J. Gerontol. B. Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci., July 1, 2008; 63(4): S239 - S247.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by The Gerontological Society of America.