Home
HOME ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Download to citation manager
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 61:P187-P194 (2006)
© 2006 The Gerontological Society of America


RESEARCH ARTICLE

Differences in the Way Older and Younger Adults Rate Threat in Faces But Not Situations

Ted Ruffman, Susan Sullivan and Nigel Edge

1 Department of Psychology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
2 Department of Psychology, University of Sussex, England.

Address correspondence to Ted Ruffman, University of Otago, Department of Psychology, Box 56, Dunedin, 9003, New Zealand. E-mail: tedr{at}psy.otago.ac.nz

We compared young and healthy older adults' ability to rate photos of faces and situations (e.g., sporting activities) for the degree of threat they posed. Older adults did not distinguish between more and less dangerous faces to the same extent as younger adults did. In contrast, we found no significant age differences in young and older adults' ability to distinguish between high- and low-danger situations. The differences between young and older adults on the face task were independent of age differences in older adults' fluid IQ. We discuss results in relation to differences between young and older adults on emotion-recognition tasks; we also discuss sociocognitive and neuropsychological (e.g., amygdala) theories of aging.







HOME ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by The Gerontological Society of America.