Home
HOME ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 60:S318-S325 (2005)
© 2005 The Gerontological Society of America


RESEARCH ARTICLE

Proxy Sources for Information on Nursing Home Residents' Quality of Life

Robert L. Kane1,, Rosalie A. Kane1, Boris Bershadsky1, Howard Degenholtz2, Kristin Kling3, Annette Totten1 and Kyoungrae Jung1

1 University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
2 University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
3 St. Cloud State University, Minnesota.

Address correspondence to Robert L. Kane, MD, Division of Health Services Research and Policy, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, 420 Delaware St. SE, D351 Mayo (MMC 197), Minneapolis, MN 55455. E-mail: kanex001{at}umn.edu

Objectives. This study explores how well staff and family proxies' reports on selected quality-of-life (QOL) domains (comfort, dignity, functional competence, privacy, meaningful activity, food enjoyment, relationships, security, and autonomy) correspond to residents' own reports.

Methods. We compared QOL domain scores for nursing home residents and 1,326 staff proxies and 989 family proxies at the individual and facility level using means, Pearson correlation statistics, and intraclass correlations. Regression models adjusted for residents' age, gender, length of stay, ability to perform activities of daily living, and cognition.

Results. For each domain in more than half the cases, proxy means were within 1 SD of the resident means. Resident and family proxy individual reports for selected domains were correlated at 0.14 to 0.46 (all p <.000). Resident and staff proxy individual reports were correlated at 0.13 to 0.37 (all p <.000). Correlation of mean levels by facility for staff proxies was 0.26 to 0.64 (generally p <.05) and for family proxies 0.13 to 0.61 (p <.01 except for one domain).

Discussion. Although staff and family proxy domain scores are significantly correlated with resident scores, the level of correlation suggests they cannot simply be substituted for resident reports of QOL. Determining how proxy reports can be used for residents who cannot be interviewed at all remains an unresolved challenge.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GerontologistHome page
C. E. Bishop, D. B. Weinberg, W. Leutz, A. Dossa, S. G. Pfefferle, and R. M. Zincavage
Nursing Assistants' Job Commitment: Effect of Nursing Home Organizational Factors and Impact on Resident Well-Being
Gerontologist, July 1, 2008; 48(suppl_1): 36 - 45.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GerontologistHome page
A. N. Rahman and J. F. Schnelle
The Nursing Home Culture-Change Movement: Recent Past, Present, and Future Directions for Research
Gerontologist, April 1, 2008; 48(2): 142 - 148.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GerontologistHome page
G. E. Alkema and D. E. Alley
Gerontology's Future: An Integrative Model for Disciplinary Advancement.
Gerontologist, October 1, 2006; 46(5): 574 - 582.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by The Gerontological Society of America.