Home
HOME ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Download to citation manager
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 59:P135-P142 (2004)
© 2004 The Gerontological Society of America


RESEARCH ARTICLE

Age-Related Differences in Arithmetic Problem-Verification Strategies

Sandrine Duverne1 and Patrick Lemaire1,2,

1 Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique–Université de Provence, Marseille.
2 Institut Universitaire de France, Marseille.

Address correspondence to Patrick Lemaire, LPC-CNRS & Université de Provence, 3 Place Victor Hugo, Case 66, 13331 Marseille, France. E-mail: lemaire{at}up.univ-mrs.fr

To test age-related differences in split and problem-difficulty effects, adults between the ages of 20 and 80 years (N = 138) performed a simple and a complex inequality verification task (e.g., 6 + 3 < 11, 271 + 182 < 458; true or false?). Split effects in verification tasks (i.e., better performance for large-split than for small-split problems) reflect strategy selection between nonexhaustive verification (e.g., evaluation of plausibility; estimation) and exhaustive verification (e.g., retrieval; calculation). Problem-difficulty effects (i.e., better performance for easy than hard problems) reflect calculation processing. Results showed decreased split effects across age groups, particularly in the complex task. Moreover, problem-difficulty effects did not vary across age groups. Age-related changes were mostly mediated by age-related declines in processing speed.







HOME ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by The Gerontological Society of America.