Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ferraro, K. F.
Right arrow Articles by Kelley-Moore, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ferraro, K. F.
Right arrow Articles by Kelley-Moore, J. A.
The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 58:S264-S270 (2003)
© 2003 The Gerontological Society of America


RESEARCH ARTICLE

A Half Century of Longitudinal Methods in Social Gerontology: Evidence of Change in the Journal

Kenneth F. Ferraro1, and Jessica A. Kelley-Moore2

1 Department of Sociology and Gerontology Program, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana.
2 Department of Sociology and Gerontology Program, University of Maryland, Baltimore.

Address correspondence to Dr. K. F. Ferraro, Professor of Sociology, 700 W. State Street, Stone Hall, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907-2059. E-mail: ferraro{at}purdue.edu

Objectives.With a focus on the use of longitudinal data, this study reviews trends in the quantitative analysis of social science data on aging during the past half century.

Methods.A content analysis was performed on 227 articles from 12 volumes that were systematically sampled from the Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences to examine change in the type of data and quantitative methods used (1946–2000).

Results.Cross-sectional analysis remains the single most frequent type of study, but the publication of analyses based on longitudinal panel data increased appreciably over the five decades studied. There was little increase in the use of repeated cross-sectional analysis.

Discussion.Despite the widespread use of cross-sectional analysis, interest in data with more than one occasion of measurement has grown among social scientists who are reviewing for and publishing in the Journal. Given the longitudinal data now available, social science research on aging should give more explicit attention to three issues: attrition, change in repeated measures of independent variables, and models to account for many waves of data.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GerontologistHome page
G. E. Alkema and D. E. Alley
Gerontology's Future: An Integrative Model for Disciplinary Advancement.
Gerontologist, October 1, 2006; 46(5): 574 - 582.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All GSA journals The Gerontologist
Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
Copyright © 2003 by The Gerontological Society of America.