Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]
Author:
Keyword(s):
Year:  Vol:  Page: 


This Article
Full Text
Full Text (PDF)
Alert me when this article is cited
Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Similar articles in this journal
Similar articles in PubMed
Alert me to new issues of the journal
Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Articles by Walsh, E. G.
Articles by Berkmann, L. F.
Articles citing this Article
PubMed
PubMed Citation
Articles by Walsh, E. G.
Articles by Berkmann, L. F.
The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 58:S38-S49 (2003)
© 2003 The Gerontological Society of America


RESEARCH ARTICLE

Cognitive Function and Acute Care Utilization

Edith G. Walsha, Bei Wua, Janet B. Mitchella and Lisa F. Berkmannb

a Center for Health Economics Research, Waltham, Massachusetts
b Department of Health and Social Behavior and the Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts

Edith G. Walsh, Research Triangle Institute, 411 Waverley Oaks Road, Suite 330, Waltham, MA 02452-8414 E-mail: ewalsh{at}rti.org.

Decision Editor: Fredric D. Wolinsky, PhD

Objectives. Little is known about variation in cognitive function across the aged population, or how use and costs of health care vary with cognitive impairment. This study was designed to create a typology of cognitive function in a nationally representative sample, and evaluate acute care use in relation to cognitive function, holding constant confounding factors. By including proxy assessments of cognitive function, this is the first study to include individuals unable to respond themselves.

Methods. We analyzed the baseline year of the Asset and Health Dynamics Among the Oldest Old (AHEAD) survey, sponsored by the National Institute on Aging, to create three levels of cognitive function, using direct measures for self-respondents (n = 6,651) and proxy evaluations for the others (n = 792). We used a two-part model to predict the likelihood of using various health services and to evaluate intensity of care among users.

Results. Sixteen percent, 64%, and 20% of the sample fell into the low, moderate, and high cognitive function groups, respectively, that differed significantly on almost all demographic and health status measures, and some utilization measures. Controlling for other health and functional status measures, lower cognitive function had a significant and negative effect on outpatient services, but did not affect hospital use directly.

Discussion. Lower cognitive function may be a barrier to outpatient care, but these analyses should be repeated using administrative use and cost data.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All GSA journals The Gerontologist
Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
Copyright © 2003 by The Gerontological Society of America.