HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hess, T. M. Articles by Rahhal, T. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hess, T. M. Articles by Rahhal, T. A.

The Impact of Stereotype Threat on Age Differences in Memory Performance

^a Department of Psychology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh
^b Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
^c Department of Psychology, Trinity College, Hartford, Connecticut

Thomas M. Hess, Department of Psychology, North Carolina State University, Box 7801, Raleigh, NC 27695-7801 E-mail: thomas_hess{at}ncsu.edu.

This study investigated the hypothesis that age differences in memory performance may be influenced by stereotype threat associated with negative cultural beliefs about the impact of aging on memory. Recall was examined in 48 young and 48 older adults under conditions varying in the degree of induced threat. Conditions that maximize threat resulted in lower performance in older adults relative to both younger adults and to older adults who did not experience threat. The degree to which threat affected older adults' performance increased along with the value that these individuals placed on their memory ability. Older adults' memory performance across experimental conditions was observed to covary with degree of activation of the negative aging stereotype, providing support for the hypothesized relationship between stereotype activation and performance. Finally, stereotype threat also influenced mnemonic strategy use, which in turn partially mediated the impact of threat on recall. These results emphasize the important role played by contextual factors in determining age differences in memory performance.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Horton, J. Baker, G. W. Pearce, and J. M. Deakin On the Malleability of Performance: Implications for Seniors Journal of Applied Gerontology, August 1, 2008; 27(4): 446 - 465. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. A. L. Stine-Morrow, J. M. Parisi, D. G. Morrow, J. Greene, and D. C. Park An Engagement Model of Cognitive Optimization Through Adulthood J. Gerontol. B. Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci., June 1, 2007; 62(suppl_Special_Issue_1): 62 - 69. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Wurm, C. Tesch-Romer, and M. J. Tomasik Longitudinal Findings on Aging-Related Cognitions, Control Beliefs, and Health in Later Life J. Gerontol. B. Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci., May 1, 2007; 62(3): P156 - P164. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Fallon, J. E. Peelle, and A. Wingfield Spoken Sentence Processing in Young and Older Adults Modulated by Task Demands: Evidence From Self-Paced Listening J. Gerontol. B. Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci., January 1, 2006; 61(1): P10 - P17. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. R. Levy Conscious Versus Unconscious Levels of Aging Self-Stereotypes: Author's Reply J. Gerontol. B. Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci., July 1, 2003; 58(4): P215 - 216. [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Helmuth All in Your Mind Sci. Aging Knowl. Environ., February 26, 2003; 2003(8): ns3 - 3. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]