Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dunlosky, J.
Right arrow Articles by Hertzog, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dunlosky, J.
Right arrow Articles by Hertzog, C.

Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, Vol 52, Issue 4 P178-P186, Copyright © 1997 by The Gerontological Society of America


ARTICLES

Older and younger adults use a functionally identical algorithm to select items for restudy during multitrial learning

J Dunlosky and C Hertzog
University of North Carolina at Greensboro, USA. j_dunlos@goodall.uncg.edu

We investigated whether aging affects several components of how people select items for study during multitrial learning. Younger and older adults studied paired-associate items and then made delayed judgements of learning (JOLs). Immediately after making a JOL for an item, some participants decided whether to restudy the item on subsequent trials; for other participants, the computer selected for restudy the items that had been judged as least-well learned. Next, paired-associate recall occurred, which was followed by restudy-test trials. As expected, age differences occurred in recall on the first trial, and this difference was propagated across trials. In contrast to the hypothesis that older adults would be more conservative in selecting items, both age groups selected to restudy (a) the items that they had rated as least-well learned and (b) the majority of items that would not be recalled on the first trial. Comparisons between participants who self-selected items vs the groups in which the computer controlled selection also converged on the conclusion of age equivalence in processes underlying item selection.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Gerontol. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci.Home page
J. Dunlosky, E. Cavallini, H. Roth, C. L. McGuire, T. Vecchi, and C. Hertzog
Do Self-Monitoring Interventions Improve Older Adult Learning?
J. Gerontol. B. Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci., June 1, 2007; 62(suppl_Special_Issue_1): 70 - 76.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All GSA journals The Gerontologist
Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
Copyright © 1997 by The Gerontological Society of America.