Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bengtson, V. L.
Right arrow Articles by Parrott, T. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bengtson, V. L.
Right arrow Articles by Parrott, T. M.

Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, Vol 52, Issue 2 S72-S88, Copyright © 1997 by The Gerontological Society of America

REVIEWS

Theory, explanation, and a third generation of theoretical development in social gerontology

VL Bengtson, EO Burgess and TM Parrott
University of Southern California, USA.

Efforts at cumulative knowledge building in social gerontology have been lax, judging from research articles published in journals between 1990 and 1994. Too little attention has been paid to the cumulative development of theory; readers are left with many empirical generalizations but underdeveloped explanations by which to interpret findings and build upon them in subsequent research. To assist future theory development in social gerontology, we review seven theoretical perspectives referenced most frequently in recent journals: (1) social constructionist, (2) social exchange, (3) life course, (4) feminist, (5) age stratification (age and society), (6) political economy of aging, and (7) critical theory. We suggest that, taken together, these represent a "third generation" of explanation in social gerontology, noting their debt to older and more established traditions in social science theory. We argue that authors and journal reviewers should place more emphasis on theory development - which means, most simply, the construction of explicit explanations in accounting for empirical findings - if knowledge development about social aspects of aging is to be cumulative, systematic, and incremental.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 GerontologistHome page
D. Dobbs, J. K. Eckert, B. Rubinstein, L. Keimig, L. Clark, A. C. Frankowski, and S. Zimmerman
An Ethnographic Study of Stigma and Ageism in Residential Care or Assisted Living
Gerontologist, August 1, 2008; 48(4): 517 - 526.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 GerontologistHome page
G. E. Alkema and D. E. Alley
Gerontology's Future: An Integrative Model for Disciplinary Advancement.
Gerontologist, October 1, 2006; 46(5): 574 - 582.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 GerontologistHome page
S. J. Fonda, E. C. Clipp, and G. L. Maddox
Patterns in Functioning Among Residents of an Affordable Assisted Living Housing Facility
Gerontologist, April 1, 2002; 42(2): 178 - 187.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 GerontologistHome page
J. A. McMullin
Diversity and the State of Sociological Aging Theory
Gerontologist, October 1, 2000; 40(5): 517 - 530.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All GSA journals The Gerontologist
Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
Copyright © 1997 by The Gerontological Society of America.