Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, Vol 52, Issue 2 S103-S111, Copyright © 1997 by The Gerontological Society of America

ARTICLES

Subject-caregiver response comparability on global health and functional status measures for African American, Puerto Rican, and Caucasian elders and their primary caregivers

RH Lawrence, SL Tennstedt and SL Almy
New England Research Institutes. ReneeL@NERI.org

Ethnic differences in response comparability and bias were evaluated for elderly African American, Puerto Rican, and non-Hispanic Caucasian elderly subjects with some degree of disability and their caregivers. Responses were compared for items assessing basic and instrumental activities of daily living, memory problems, confusion, and global health status. In general, for all ethnic groups, response comparability, based on kappa, was only poor to fair, with the lowest agreement found for items assessing memory problems and confusion. When disagreements occurred, caregivers tended to overestimate impairment relative to the elderly subjects, regardless of ethnicity. However, there were very few significant differences between the response patterns of the caregivers of these different ethnic groups. Thus, although three may be bias in the responses of caregivers relative to elderly persons, in general further bias is not introduced by ethnic differences in comparability of caregiver responses for elders with some degree of disability.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. M. Bates-Jensen, S. F. Simmons, J. F. Schnelle, and C. Alessi Evaluating the Accuracy of Minimum Data Set Bed-Mobility Ratings Against Independent Performance Assessments: Systematic Error and Directions for Improvement Gerontologist, December 1, 2005; 45(6): 731 - 738. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]