Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Finkel, D.
Right arrow Articles by McGue, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Finkel, D.
Right arrow Articles by McGue, M.

Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, Vol 50, Issue 2 P104-P113, Copyright © 1995 by The Gerontological Society of America

ARTICLES

Genetic and environmental influences on functional age: a twin study

D Finkel, K Whitfield and M McGue
Division of Social Sciences, Indiana University Southeast, USA.

Twin analyses were conducted to determine the relative influence of genetic and environmental factors on functional aging. As part of the ongoing Minnesota Twin Study of Adult Development and Aging (MTSADA), measures of 30 demographic, cognitive, physiological, personality, and behavioral variables were available from 140 monozygotic twin pairs and 97 dizygotic twin pairs ranging in age from 27 to 88 years. Functional age was based on a general linear regression model with chronological age as the dependent variable. Stepwise regression determined the subset of variables by MTSADA providing the best prediction of chronological age. Factor analysis of these 12 variables resulted in three factors: physiological measures, cognitive abilities, and processing speed. When entered into, a regression equation, the three factors accounted for 66% of the variance in chronological age. Analysis of twin similarity for components of functional age suggested the relative influence of genetic and environmental factors varies greatly for different components of functional aging. In addition, the genetic and shared environmental influences on the three components were common to all three, while the nonshared environmental influences were specific to each component.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci.Home page
D. Karasik, S. Demissie, L. A. Cupples, and D. P. Kiel
Disentangling the Genetic Determinants of Human Aging: Biological Age as an Alternative to the Use of Survival Measures
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., May 1, 2005; 60(5): 574 - 587.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Aging HealthHome page
D. Finkel, N. L. Pedersen, S. Berg, and B. Johansson
Quantitative Genetic Analysis of Biobehavioral Markers of Aging in Swedish Studies of Adult Twins
J Aging Health, February 1, 2000; 12(1): 47 - 68.
[Abstract] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All GSA journals The Gerontologist
Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
Copyright © 1995 by The Gerontological Society of America.